During his tenure as a principal, Machiguchi promoted, even at the elementary school level, what he termed as "productive vocational activity" (pg 19). He prescribed a half day of learning and a half day of activity, giving students practical application of essential skills... in the region in which he taught, these skills were mostly agricultural or manual labor. His writings, Ikeda explains, delineate the benefits of this approach:
1) Provides efficiency in teaching
2) Effective use of educational facilities by doubling the (in-class) student body
3) Provides no "examination hell" as students are applying skills in front of experienced eyes rather than testing on paper
4) Graduates leave with skills and experience to enhance meaningful work
This holistic approach to education and generally to human development, in theory, should produce truly global citizens - which should be the driving force behind education and the essence of education. Ikeda describes Makiguchi's six transformative criteria (indices) for "enabling the student to engage in value creation":
1) From unconscious, emotional modes of living to a life of self-mastery, consciousness and rationality
2) From a life of less to one of greater value creation
3) From self-centered to a social and altruistic mode of living
4) From dependent to independent modes of living in which one is capable of making principle-based judgement
5) From a life of dominated by external influences to a life of autonomy
6) From a life under the sway of desires to self-reflective modes of living in which one is capable of integrating one's actions into a larger sense of purpose.
So where are you at? Do you waiver between several criteria or are you staunchly, steadfastly adhering to one more than the others? Do all apply to your life equally or is one a more prominent, driving force? Can one criterion exist without the others? Is there an area where you should, could, or are mindfully doing more work? Have you ever really considered these concepts in a concrete way?